New EFCC Boss employ judges to prioritize substance over technicalities..

    In emphasizing the importance of delivering justice swiftly and effectively in cases involving fraud, the new Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Ola Olukoyede, has underscored the need for judges to prioritize substance over technicalities. His remarks come as a call to streamline the criminal justice system, urging a focus on expeditious adjudication without compromising the integrity of the legal process.


    Olukoyede’s insistence on looking beyond technicalities implies a desire for a justice system that goes beyond procedural intricacies and prioritizes the core issues at hand. This approach seeks to address concerns about lengthy legal processes that often lead to delayed justice. By advocating for a shift in perspective, he encourages judges to concentrate on the substance of fraud allegations, ensuring that justice is not obscured by legal nuances.

    One key proposal put forth by Olukoyede is the time limit for cases related to fraud allegations. Suggesting that such cases should not exceed a five-year duration from the High Court to the Supreme Court, he aims to set a reasonable timeframe for the resolution of these matters. This recommendation aligns with the broader goal of enhancing the efficiency of the criminal justice system, preventing cases from lingering in legal limbo for extended periods.

    The urgency to expedite cases involving financial crimes is not only about timely resolution but also about sending a strong deterrent message. Swift justice serves as a deterrent to potential wrongdoers, demonstrating that fraudulent activities will be met with prompt legal consequences. This proactive stance aligns with the broader mission of anti-corruption agencies to curb financial crimes and foster a culture of accountability.

    In addressing the issue of prolonged prosecutions, Olukoyede has extended an invitation to the legislative arm of the government. By suggesting that the Senate can play a pivotal role in this matter, he highlights the collaborative nature required for comprehensive justice reform. Legislative interventions, such as enacting laws that prescribe time limits for specific types of cases, can contribute to a more streamlined and efficient legal process.

    The acknowledgment of the positive impact of a well-functioning criminal justice system on anti-corruption efforts underscores the symbiotic relationship between law enforcement agencies and the legal framework. Olukoyede’s advocacy aligns with the broader narrative of ensuring that the fight against corruption is not only robust in investigative and enforcement aspects but also effective in delivering justice. This holistic approach recognizes the interconnectedness of the various components within the legal system.

    As the head of the EFCC, Olukoyede’s stance reflects the agency’s commitment to advancing its mandate in an environment conducive to swift and fair justice. It signals a departure from a business-as-usual approach, emphasizing the need for systemic improvements that address both procedural challenges and the overarching objective of combating financial crimes. The call for the Senate’s involvement further emphasizes the collaborative nature required for a successful overhaul of the criminal justice system.

    In conclusion, Ola Olukoyede’s emphasis on the importance of looking beyond technicalities and expediting cases related to fraud allegations reflects a commitment to enhancing the effectiveness of the criminal justice system. His proposals for time limits and legislative collaboration underscore the multifaceted approach needed to create a legal environment that is not only efficient but also conducive to the broader goals of accountability and anti-corruption efforts.

    Visit: to Read More NEWS